Monday, May 14, 2012

Jimmy Carter -- Hooray!

President Carter acted on this 2 years ago.  Published here for research purposes only.  From Huffpost

Jimmy Carter Leaves Church Over Treatment of Women

2 years ago
Text Size
After more than 60 years together, Jimmy Carter has announced himself at odds with the Southern Baptist Church -- and he's decided it's time they go their separate ways. Via Feministing, the former president called the decision "unavoidable" after church leaders prohibited women from being ordained and insisted women be "subservient to their husbands." Said Carter in an essay in The Age:

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.
And, later:
The truth is that male religious leaders have had -- and still have -- an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world.

After watching everyone from philandering politicians to Iran's president taking a sudden look heavenwards when the roof starts to come down on them, it's refreshing to see Carter calling out the role of religion in the mistreatment of women.

The question for Carter -- and for others who find themselves at odds with leadership -- is, when a group you're deeply involved in starts to move away from your own core beliefs, do you stay and try to change from within or, at some point, do you have to look for the exit? Carter did give the former a shot -- in recent years publicly criticizing and distancing himself from church leadership, while staying involved with his church. Now, he's seeing if absence might do what presence did not.
Filed Under: Religion, Woman Up

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Here are 2 photos published by NYTimes and Washington Post.  Are these papers respected, and are such CIA asset media?  How did this get through the photo editor?  And why did the Olson's have phony pictures of themselves together?  Was it necessary to lie about these two?  Some of their photos on flickr are also faked.  The couple is walking away down the aisle and the people are happy and looking mostly forward.  Wouldn't they be looking at the newly married?  These pictures surely cause a lot of suspicion.

type="amzn"category="apparel">Men'.0;s Shoes