Official Japanese Products
Come experience the most thoroughly jam-packed websites for Japanese goods on the Internet.
www.nippon-yasan.com
Our growing number of customers will tell you we sell only Official Japanese goods.
On nippon-yasan you can purchase anything Japanese. We sell Japanese clothing; food; stuffed dolls; figurines. You can find earrings and pendants. We also carry a limited edition of Miku Yasai Juice, as well as Manga and anime. You’ll find computer games, such as X Box 360, Nintendo and Playstation. We have plenty of Japanese music cds, cat dolls, weekly magazines and other traditional items.
For your convenience nippon-yasan has different payment methods and shipping routes. You can pay via PayPal, credit card, bank wire (for French and European customers); and we’re sure to get your gift to you promptly. When we sell a product as a “gift,” you don’t need to pay taxes on it. We try to ship in 3 or 4 days. If something is not in stock, we say so -- “0” -- on our website. We then track it down and ship it to you. Sometimes we can ship your items via “eco-registered - small packet.” This method gives the product a less expensive shipping rate.
We accept various currencies. USD, EU, Livre Sterling, Franc Suisse, Yen, R$, BRL, MXN and ARS. New products have manufacturer’s warranties.
If you buy a lot from Nippon-yasan, we can price your items under “Society.” And we have the best prices for Japanese culture on the market.
To contact us simply send an email to: contact@nippon-yasan.com. Among other sites, you can find us on popular Facebook: Nippon-Yasan.com. Our employees speak fluent English, French, Spanish and Japanese.
Thank you for visiting our site. We hope you will find here the best in Japanese products. Sayonara!
Witness-2
Political issues.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Friday, June 22, 2012
From NY Times
PHILADELPHIA — Msgr. William J. Lynn, a former archbishop’s aide, was
found guilty Friday of one count of endangering children, becoming the
first senior official of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States
to be convicted of covering up child sexual abuses by priests under his
supervision.
Matt Rourke/Associated Press
Multimedia
Connect With Us on Twitter
Follow @NYTNational for breaking news and headlines.
The 12-member jury acquitted Monsignor Lynn, of the Archdiocese of
Philadelphia, on a conspiracy charge and a second count of endangerment
after a three-month trial that prosecutors and victims rights groups
called a milestone in the sexual abuse scandals that have shaken the
Catholic church.
Despite the mixed outcome, the guilty verdict was widely seen as a
victory for the district attorney’s office, which has been investigating
the archdiocese aggressively since 2002, and it was hailed by victim
advocates who have argued for years that senior church officials should
be held accountable for concealing evidence and transferring predatory
priests to unwary parishes.
Monsignor Lynn sat impassively as the jury read the verdicts, but some
relatives behind him were in tears. Judge M. Teresa Sarmina of the
Common Pleas Court revoked his bail and the monsignor stood up, removed
his black clerical jacket and was led from the courtroom by sheriff’s
deputies. His conviction could result in a prison sentence of
three-and-a-half to seven years.
The trial sent a sobering message to church officials and others
overseeing children around the country, a message punctuated by the
conviction of Monsignor Lynn, who was an aide to the late Cardinal
Anthony J. Bevilacqua.
“I think that bishops and chancery officials understand that they will
no longer get a pass on these types of crimes,” said Nicholas P.
Cafardi, a professor of law at Duquesne University, a canon lawyer and
frequent church adviser.
“Priests who sexually abuse youngsters and the chancery officials who
enabled it,” he said, “can expect criminal prosecution.”
The trial cast a harsh light on the top leadership of the archdiocese,
especially Cardinal Bevilacqua, the archbishop of Philadelphia from 1988
to 2003, who died in January. Monsignor Lynn’s own lawyer told the jury
that “in this trial, you have seen the dark side of the church.”
The revelations of sexual abuse and seeming official indifference have
tormented an archdiocese that was long known for imperious leaders and
an insular camaraderie among its priests – “the priestly equivalent of
the blue wall of silence,” said Rocco Palmo, the Philadelphia-based
writer of Whispers in the Loggia, a blog on Catholic affairs. It has
also been costly: the financially ailing archdiocese said this week that
legal fees and internal investigations spurred by the abuse cases had
cost $11.6 million since early 2011.
Cardinal Bevilacqua and his aides, the prosecutors argued, sought to
avoid scandal and costly lawsuits at almost any price, putting the
reputation of the archdiocese ahead of protecting vulnerable children.
Before the verdict, Monsignor Lynn’s lawyers promised to appeal any
conviction, arguing that the law on child endangerment at the time did
not apply to supervisors and that the judge had allowed prejudicial
evidence, among other issues.
Monsignor Lynn, 61, served as secretary for clergy for the 1.5
million-member Archdiocese of Philadelphia from 1992 to 2004, in charge
of recommending priest assignments and investigating abuse complaints.
Prosecutors said he played down credible accusations and reassigned
known predators to unwary parishes.
The prosecutors presented a flood of evidence, legal experts said, that
the archdiocese had concealed abuse accusations and that Monsignor Lynn
had not acted strongly to keep suspected molesters away from children,
let alone to report them to law enforcement.
But the tortuous jury deliberations and mixed verdict showed the
difficulty of placing criminal blame on one church official when there
was evidence that others, starting with the cardinal at the time, had
worked to prevent bad publicity and lawsuits. The jurors also wrestled
with the definition of conspiracy, at one point asking the judge to
define “agree,” and with the question of criminal intent on the part of
Monsignor Lynn, who presented himself as an affable man who tried his
best.
- 1
- 2
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: June 22, 2012
A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that the jury had deadlocked on two counts against Msgr. William J. Lynn; the jury acquitted Monsignor Lynn of conspiracy and a second count of endangerment.
Correction: June 22, 2012
A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that the jury had deadlocked on two counts against Msgr. William J. Lynn; the jury acquitted Monsignor Lynn of conspiracy and a second count of endangerment.
Monday, June 4, 2012
There's a new book about the Kennedy Assassination called "A Secret Order: Investigating the High Strangeness and Synchronicity in the JFK Assassination" by H.P. Abarelli. Publishing date is Sept.22. You can pre-order it on amazon.com. They already have a page on it at amazon.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Jimmy Carter -- Hooray!
President Carter acted on this 2 years ago. Published here for research purposes only. From Huffpost
Jimmy Carter Leaves Church Over Treatment of Women
2 years ago
After
more than 60 years together, Jimmy Carter has announced himself at odds
with the Southern Baptist Church -- and he's decided it's time they go
their separate ways. Via Feministing,
the former president called the decision "unavoidable" after church
leaders prohibited women from being ordained and insisted women be
"subservient to their husbands." Said Carter in an essay in The Age:
The question for Carter -- and for others who find themselves at odds with leadership -- is, when a group you're deeply involved in starts to move away from your own core beliefs, do you stay and try to change from within or, at some point, do you have to look for the exit? Carter did give the former a shot -- in recent years publicly criticizing and distancing himself from church leadership, while staying involved with his church. Now, he's seeing if absence might do what presence did not.
At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.And, later:
The truth is that male religious leaders have had -- and still have -- an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world.After watching everyone from philandering politicians to Iran's president taking a sudden look heavenwards when the roof starts to come down on them, it's refreshing to see Carter calling out the role of religion in the mistreatment of women.
The question for Carter -- and for others who find themselves at odds with leadership -- is, when a group you're deeply involved in starts to move away from your own core beliefs, do you stay and try to change from within or, at some point, do you have to look for the exit? Carter did give the former a shot -- in recent years publicly criticizing and distancing himself from church leadership, while staying involved with his church. Now, he's seeing if absence might do what presence did not.
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Here are 2 photos published by NYTimes and Washington Post. Are these papers respected, and are such CIA asset media? How did this get through the photo editor? And why did the Olson's have phony pictures of themselves together? Was it necessary to lie about these two? Some of their photos on flickr are also faked. The couple is walking away down the aisle and the people are happy and looking mostly forward. Wouldn't they be looking at the newly married? These pictures surely cause a lot of suspicion.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Full coverage
'OJ didn't do it, his son did'
Independent Online - 2 hours ago
AP A 2008 file photo showing OJ Simpson in court during his sentencing
hearing after he was convicted of a gunpoint hotel room heist. A US
private investigator claims he knows who really killed Nicole Brown and
Ron Goldman in 1994 – and it wasn't OJ ...
'OJ Is Innocent And I Can Prove It': In New Book, PI William Dear Claims OJ ...
Huffington Post - 13 hours ago
In his new book, private investigator William Dear claims to have
circumstantial evidence that suggests OJ Simpson did not kill Nicole
Brown or Ron Goldman. It's often said that the only certainties in life
are death and taxes.
OJ Simpson's son is the real killer, says new book
London Free Press - 16 hours ago
By QMI Agency A Texas private investigator, in a new book, claims OJ
Simpson's oldest son, Jason, has been overlooked as a suspect in the
grisly murders of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. William Dear claims to
have circumstantial evidence collected ...
OJ Simpson Innocent? Private Eye Claims Simpson's Son, Jason, Did The Killings
Huffington Post - 22 hours ago
A private investigator claims that OJ Simpson is innocent of murdering
his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ronald Goldman. OJ Simpson wasn't
the killer: It was his son who murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman,
says a private investigator.
'OJ Simpson's son killed Nicole Brown'
Hindustan Times - Apr 2, 2012
In a new book, a private investigator assigned to OJ Simpson's trial
for the murder of Nicole Simpson Brown and Ronald Goldman, has detailed
what he and his team of forensic experts have found over the past 17
years. In the book titled 'OJ Is Innocent ...
New book alleges OJ Simpson's son killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman
Fox News - Apr 1, 2012
DALLAS – Celebrity private eye William Dear doesn't think OJ Simpson
got away with murder. The real killer is the gridiron great's troubled
oldest son, Jason Simpson, the Texas gumshoe theorizes in his latest
book, "OJ Is Innocent and I Can Prove It," ...
OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife - his son did it, claims private investigator
NEWS.com.au - Apr 1, 2012
OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife or her friend - his son did it. That's
the theory being pushed by a Texan private investigator, who claims he
has unearthed evidence that links Jason Simpson to the 1994 murders.
William C. Dear claims OJ Simpson tried ...
New Book Says O.J. Simpson's Son Jason Killed Nicole Brown
Us Magazine - Apr 1, 2012
From the title of William Dear's new book OJ Is Innocent and I Can
Prove It, one may think that OJ Simpson has an ally. But Dear's finger
is pointed right at Simpson's own son, Jason Simpson, who was 24 at the
time that his dad was on trial for the ...
New book claims OJ Simpson is innocent and his son Jason is the real killer
Daily Mail - Apr 1, 2012
By Daily Mail Reporter A Texas private investigator claims he knows who
really killed Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman in 1994. And it wasn't OJ
Simpson. In a new book, 'OJ is Innocent and I Can Prove It,' William C.
Dear alleges Simpson went on trial, ...
OJ's Son's Not "The Real Killer" -- Regardless...
Village Voice (blog) - 1 hour ago
By James King By Ben Sin By Victoria Bekiempis By Victoria Bekiempis By
Victoria Bekiempis By James King By James King By James King By Esther
Zuckerman By Esther Zuckerman By James King Tue., Apr. 3 2012 at 7:15 AM
The story about a Texas private ...
Did OJ Simpson's Son Actually Murder Nicole Brown?
Peace FM Online - 1 hour ago
vibe : In yet another book tackling the infamous OJ Simpson trial of
the 90s, author William Dear has released "OJ Is Innocent and I Can
Prove It," a tale that fingers Simpson's son, Jason Simpson, as the true
murderer of Nicole Simpson Brown and ...
OJ didn't do it, son Jason did: New book
Pune Mirror - 9 hours ago
Washington: In a new book, a celebrity investigator assigned to OJ
Simpson's trial for the 1994 murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson
and her friend Ronald Goldman, has detailed what he and his team of
forensic experts have found over the past 17 ...
Private Eye Alleges OJ's Son Killed Nicole Brown
CrabbyGolightly.com - 14 hours ago
A TEXAS PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR CLAIMS OJ'S SON KILLED NICOLE BROWN AND
FRIEND RON GOLDMAN. In his new book (of course), William C. Dear
believes that former football great OJ Simpson is innocent of the
murders he was acquitted of in 1995.
Jason Simpson, Nicole Brown Allegations Are Not Entirely New: EXCLUSIVE
LALATE - 15 hours ago
LOS ANGELES (LALATE EXCLUSIVE) – Jason Simpson (photos below) is the
subject of new a book today about the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson.
But the author's allegations against Jason Simpson, OJ Simpson's eldest
son, are not entirely new, ...
OJ Simpson Son: Jason Simpson Named as Killer of Nicole Brown in New Book by ...
IBTimes.co.uk - 15 hours ago
By IBTimes Staff Reporter | April 2, 2012 9:57 PM GMT A new book by
William Dear entitled "OJ Is Innocent and I Can Prove It" named OJ
Simpson's son Jason Simpson as the killer of Nicole Simpson Brown and
Ronald Goldman.
OJ Simpson Innocent: Private Investigator Claims the Son is the Real Killer
International Business Times - 20 hours ago
A private investigator claimed that OJ Simpson was innocent and the
true killer, in fact, is his eldest son Jason Simpson, the New York Post
reported. William Dear, a celebrity private eye, based his conclusion
from the seventeen-year investigation ...
Jason Simpson, OJ Simpson Son, Battles Nicole Brown Simpson Allegations
LALATE - 22 hours ago
LOS ANGELES (LALATE) – Jason Simpson, OJ Simpson's son, is battling
Nicole Brown Simpson allegations. William Dear claims that Jason Simpson
murdered Nicole Brown Simpson. For decades, rumors have existed that
speculated someone close to Simpson ...
OJ Simpson's Son Killed Nicole, Claims Author: Examining His Evidence
Hollywood.com - 22 hours ago
By Michael Arbeiter , Hollywood.com Staff | Monday, April 02, 2012
Private investigator William C. Dear isn't satisfied being one of three
people in the world who maintains that OJ Simpson is innocent of murder.
But the celebrity detective ups the ante ...
I Can Prove OJ Innocent: Private Eye
Newser - 22 hours ago
By Matt Cantor, Newser Staff (Newser) – OJ Simpson wasn't the killer:
It was his son who murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, says a private
investigator. Texas PI William Dear has spent 18 years probing the
murders, and he explains his case in a new ...
OJ Simpson's Son Killed Nicole Brown Claims New Tell-All Book
TaleTela - 22 hours ago
A new book surrounding OJ Simpson's infamous 1994 murder trial claims
it was in fact the star's son Jason who killed Nicole Simpson Brown and
Ronald Goldman. Private investigator William Dear makes the shocking
allegation in his tell-all book, ...
OJ Simpson Shock Claim: Son Committed Murders, PI Says
Celebrity News and Style - Apr 2, 2012
OJ Simpson is innocent and his son committed the murders for which his
father was put on trial, a PI has claimed. Surely this has to be some
terrible April Fool's joke, as the story broke yesterday. But no.
Private investigator William Dear has written ...
BOOK: “OJ SIMPSON IS INNOCENT AND I CAN PROVE IT!"
The National Enquirer - Apr 2, 2012
by NATIONAL ENQUIRER staff Photography by: AP Private investigator
WILLIAM DEAR's new book claims that Jason Simpson, not his dad OJ
SIMPSON. murdered Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman on June 12, 1994.
In “OJ Is Innocent And I Can Prove It”, ...
Texas P.I. William Dear Claims To Have Proof O.J. Didn't Do It...Which Is ...
Village Voice (blog) - Apr 2, 2012
By James King By James King By Esther Zuckerman By Esther Zuckerman By
James King Texas PI William Dear Claims To Have Proof OJ Didn't Do
It...Which Is Adorable. Argues "Juice's" Son is "The Real Killer" By
James King Mon., Apr. 2 2012 at 7:35 AM In ...
'OJ Simson was innocent; son Jason was the real murderer'
Daily Bhaskar - Apr 2, 2012
OJ Simpson was innocent and faced trial to deflect the blame away from
his son Jason, who was the real killer of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, a
Texas private detective has claimed. According to a UK Daily Mail
report, the claim has been made by ...
OJ Simpson is innocent: private eye says son Jason killed Nicole and Ron
CBS 21 - Apr 1, 2012
The real killer is the gridiron great's troubled oldest son, Jason,
theorizes the Texas gumshoe in his latest book, “OJ Is Innocent and I
Can Prove It.” Dear has spent 17 years de-constructing the murders of
Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman on the ...
Private Eye: OJ Simpson Son Killed Nicole Brown Simpson
TheImproper.com - Apr 1, 2012
By TheImproper, April 1st, 2012 OJ Simpson, acquitted of the 1994
murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman,
may have truly been innocent but covered up for his son, the real
murderer. Private investigator William C. Dear ...
OJ DIDN'T DO IT!
Weekly World News (satire) - Apr 1, 2012
By Tap Vann A private investigator proves that the real killer of
Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman was… Jason Simpson, OJ's son. In a new
book, 'OJ is Innocent and I Can Prove It,' William C. Dear alleges
Simpson went on trial, and was acquitted of murder, ...
New book claims OJ Simpson never killed Nicole Brown, his son Jason did.
scallywagandvagabond - Apr 1, 2012
Private investigator William Dear has just come out with a new book
titled, “OJ is innocent and I can prove it,” and judging from some of
the responses on the web the book is creating some degree of dissent.
Then again perhaps that is the whole purpose ...
*************
I always believed he was innocent. But I kept it to myself as there were crazy people obsessed with his alleged guilt. The judge that put him away now has her own show. You can't tell me OJ was put away because of what he did. Boys fighting with boys. OJ would have been covered with blood if he committed those murders. He happened on the scene. Remember the sock that wasn't in the first picture, but which showed up later there on the rug. It had a forensic substance on it -- EDTA? I'm not sure of the name of the chemical. -- KathyCollins
I always believed he was innocent. But I kept it to myself as there were crazy people obsessed with his alleged guilt. The judge that put him away now has her own show. You can't tell me OJ was put away because of what he did. Boys fighting with boys. OJ would have been covered with blood if he committed those murders. He happened on the scene. Remember the sock that wasn't in the first picture, but which showed up later there on the rug. It had a forensic substance on it -- EDTA? I'm not sure of the name of the chemical. -- KathyCollins
I read this book when it came out. Please read it.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Stay out of our Wombs
The Catholic Church is trying to fool us again with their false morality. Now it's a problem of the Church getting involved in legislation that pertains to women. It's abortion and contraception again. What right do they have in our legislation? I learned the meaning of celibacy. You don't have relations with another man, if you're gay. You NEVER go out with or be seen with a woman. Celibacy means you do it to little boys left in your care. It must be up in the billions how much money the Catholic Church paid over their "celibacy," yet they want their power back. This might even be a diversionary tactic regarding countries, our economy, etc. Here's the worst of it:
"U.S. Catholic Church leaders said they will fight President Barack Obama's controversial birth-control insurance coverage policy despite his compromise that religious employers would not have to offer free contraceptives for workers, shifting the responsibility to insurers.
In an abrupt policy shift aimed at trying to end a growing election-year firestorm, Obama on Friday announced the compromise.
But the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said its concerns were not addressed and cited "serious moral concerns."
In a statement issued Friday evening, the bishops said Obama's proposal "continues to involve needless government intrusion in the internal governance of religious institutions, and to threaten government coercion of religious people and groups to violate their most deeply held convictions."
"We will therefore continue - with no less vigor, no less sense of urgency - our efforts to correct this problem through the other two branches of government," the bishops said in urging Congress to take action to overturn the rule.
The regulation at the center of the controversy requires religious-affiliated groups such as charities, hospitals and universities, but not churches themselves, to provide employees with coverage for birth control as other health insurance providers must do.
Catholic Church leaders and Obama's Republican opponents previously led the fight against the rule requiring coverage for contraceptives as a violation of religious freedom, making it a potential big issue in the 2012 presidential race.
Obama's compromise sought to accommodate religious organizations, such as Catholic hospitals and universities. But the reaction from the bishops and other Catholic leaders made clear the battle would continue.
NO "CLEAR PROTECTION"
The bishops said the compromise failed to provide "clear protection" for many employers who might oppose birth control personally but not be classified as a religious institution, and thus ineligible to seek exemption from the federal mandate to provide free contraception as part of every insurance package.
Under the compromise, religious employers could opt out of providing coverage, but their workers could then ask their insurance company for that benefit, and the company would be required to provide it free of charge.
In reality, the bishops suggested, that meant the employer would still in effect be subsidizing the benefit, because the insurance company would likely pay for it out of the pool of revenues it earned from its contract with the employer.
"This, too, raises serious moral concerns," the bishops said.
Meanwhile, three religious groups will continue to pursue their legal challenges to the government's regulation, despite Obama's announcement, said Hannah Smith, a lawyer at the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty, which represents the plaintiffs.
The lawsuits, filed by two religious colleges and a Catholic television network, said the government violated their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and religion. Two were filed last year and the third was filed last week.
The rule, initially announced on January 20, sparked an outcry not only from Catholic leaders but also from social conservatives, including Republican presidential hopefuls. It even drew opposition from several Democratic lawmakers.
Republicans have seized on the issue, seeking to put Obama on the defensive as signs of economic improvement appear to have re-energized his re-election bid.
Obama's compromise was aimed at preventing the controversy from becoming a liability for him with Catholic voters, while at the same time trying not to anger his liberal base.
"Birth control is basic healthcare and women should have access to birth control, no matter where they work," said Tait Sye, a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood.
"It should not be left up to a boss's personal beliefs whether his employees should be allowed birth control coverage," he said.
"SHELL GAME"
Michael O'Dea, the founder and executive director of Christus Medicus Foundation, a nonprofit advocacy group for religious healthcare providers, said many Catholic institutions have created their own self-insurance plans to get around state regulations requiring independent insurers to provide birth control if they cover other prescription drugs.
The compromise, he said, would require those insurance plans to cover the contraception - even if the insurers are arms of the Catholic Church.
"This compromise means nothing. It is nothing more than a shell game," O'Dea said.
Polls indicate a majority of Americans and Catholics support requiring contraception coverage.
On Saturday a group supporting expanded access to birth control released a survey showing that 57 percent of Catholic women favor the compromise set forth by Obama.
It found that 56 percent of independent Catholic voters favored the revised contraceptive coverage rule.
Among Hispanic Catholics, who could be pivotal in swing states such as New Mexico and Nevada, the poll found 59 percent supported the policy.
The survey, commissioned by the Coalition to Protect Women's Health Care and conducted on Friday night by Public Policy Polling, queried 466 Catholic voters. It had a margin of error of 4.5 percentage points.
© Newsmax. All rights reserved.
"U.S. Catholic Church leaders said they will fight President Barack Obama's controversial birth-control insurance coverage policy despite his compromise that religious employers would not have to offer free contraceptives for workers, shifting the responsibility to insurers.
In an abrupt policy shift aimed at trying to end a growing election-year firestorm, Obama on Friday announced the compromise.
But the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said its concerns were not addressed and cited "serious moral concerns."
In a statement issued Friday evening, the bishops said Obama's proposal "continues to involve needless government intrusion in the internal governance of religious institutions, and to threaten government coercion of religious people and groups to violate their most deeply held convictions."
"We will therefore continue - with no less vigor, no less sense of urgency - our efforts to correct this problem through the other two branches of government," the bishops said in urging Congress to take action to overturn the rule.
The regulation at the center of the controversy requires religious-affiliated groups such as charities, hospitals and universities, but not churches themselves, to provide employees with coverage for birth control as other health insurance providers must do.
Catholic Church leaders and Obama's Republican opponents previously led the fight against the rule requiring coverage for contraceptives as a violation of religious freedom, making it a potential big issue in the 2012 presidential race.
Obama's compromise sought to accommodate religious organizations, such as Catholic hospitals and universities. But the reaction from the bishops and other Catholic leaders made clear the battle would continue.
NO "CLEAR PROTECTION"
The bishops said the compromise failed to provide "clear protection" for many employers who might oppose birth control personally but not be classified as a religious institution, and thus ineligible to seek exemption from the federal mandate to provide free contraception as part of every insurance package.
Under the compromise, religious employers could opt out of providing coverage, but their workers could then ask their insurance company for that benefit, and the company would be required to provide it free of charge.
In reality, the bishops suggested, that meant the employer would still in effect be subsidizing the benefit, because the insurance company would likely pay for it out of the pool of revenues it earned from its contract with the employer.
"This, too, raises serious moral concerns," the bishops said.
Meanwhile, three religious groups will continue to pursue their legal challenges to the government's regulation, despite Obama's announcement, said Hannah Smith, a lawyer at the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty, which represents the plaintiffs.
The lawsuits, filed by two religious colleges and a Catholic television network, said the government violated their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and religion. Two were filed last year and the third was filed last week.
The rule, initially announced on January 20, sparked an outcry not only from Catholic leaders but also from social conservatives, including Republican presidential hopefuls. It even drew opposition from several Democratic lawmakers.
Republicans have seized on the issue, seeking to put Obama on the defensive as signs of economic improvement appear to have re-energized his re-election bid.
Obama's compromise was aimed at preventing the controversy from becoming a liability for him with Catholic voters, while at the same time trying not to anger his liberal base.
"Birth control is basic healthcare and women should have access to birth control, no matter where they work," said Tait Sye, a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood.
"It should not be left up to a boss's personal beliefs whether his employees should be allowed birth control coverage," he said.
"SHELL GAME"
Michael O'Dea, the founder and executive director of Christus Medicus Foundation, a nonprofit advocacy group for religious healthcare providers, said many Catholic institutions have created their own self-insurance plans to get around state regulations requiring independent insurers to provide birth control if they cover other prescription drugs.
The compromise, he said, would require those insurance plans to cover the contraception - even if the insurers are arms of the Catholic Church.
"This compromise means nothing. It is nothing more than a shell game," O'Dea said.
Polls indicate a majority of Americans and Catholics support requiring contraception coverage.
On Saturday a group supporting expanded access to birth control released a survey showing that 57 percent of Catholic women favor the compromise set forth by Obama.
It found that 56 percent of independent Catholic voters favored the revised contraceptive coverage rule.
Among Hispanic Catholics, who could be pivotal in swing states such as New Mexico and Nevada, the poll found 59 percent supported the policy.
The survey, commissioned by the Coalition to Protect Women's Health Care and conducted on Friday night by Public Policy Polling, queried 466 Catholic voters. It had a margin of error of 4.5 percentage points.
© Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Share:"
Is another President going to be killed? I hope that's not rumblings I hear under the White House. So far Obama's towed the line. When he had to announce that Usama bin Laden was just killed by our troops, to me, it was an absolute lie and I realized they'd gotten to him. He is not the most powerful man in the world. Neither is his presidency.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)